The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the United States has adopted new regulations that require public companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents within four days. To the positive, this initiative seeks to increase transparency and safeguard investors against potential cybersecurity risks. However, it also puts new weight and responsibility on enterprises that may not yet be ready for the challenge. Meeting this stringent 4-day standard means that enterprises now must be able to investigate cyberattacks swiftly and precisely to determine the significance of security incidents. This was more feasible when incidents primarily impacted on-premises environments. Now that the threat landscape extends across multi-cloud and SaaS environments, there is an added measure of complexity in meeting the expectation.  

What the New SEC Cyber Disclosure Rules Mean for Enterprises

Companies must promptly evaluate the severity of a data breach and cybersecurity incident to determine if it is "material" and requires immediate disclosure. This requires addressing three fundamental concerns regarding the occurrence:

1. What access did the attacker gain in the cyber incident? It is crucial to quickly determine the extent of an attacker's access to an organization's systems. Enterprises must determine whether the intruder obtained unauthorized access, deeply penetrated critical infrastructure, or merely scratched the surface. 

2. What data was compromised? Understanding the scope of data compromised during a cyber attack is crucial for assessing the enterprise’s potential risks and impact on its stakeholders. Identifying sensitive data that may have been compromised can aid in the formulation of an appropriate response.  

3. Where did the attack originate? Determining the attack vector, i.e., the method used by the perpetrator to infiltrate the organization's network, is essential for assessing the sophistication level and potential cybersecurity risk. This data can inform future security measures and cybersecurity practices and aid in the prevention of similar assaults.

Developing New Capabilities for Rapid Breach Investigations

To meet the SEC rule on stricter reporting deadlines, enterprises will not only require new organizational focus but also need to be enabled with the latest incident response capabilities. For example, enterprises must seek solutions that cover them across all their cloud and SaaS environments, offer greater degrees of visibility and breach readiness, and can analyze the forensic data collected to provide swift answers. Because traditional incident response methods routinely require weeks and months to collect data following a breach, it becomes clear how vital innovative approaches are.

Migita’s Threat Detection, Investigation and Response Solution Supports the SEC Requirement

Mitiga's automation platform provides an all-inclusive solution for cloud and SaaS environments that supports enterprises, before, during, and after an attack through a mix of readiness, risk management, threat detection and hunting, and automated response capabilities. We help organizations prepare for potential cyber assaults and cybersecurity threats by proactively constructing a Cloud Security Data Lake and streaming the necessary forensic data to it from across their cloud and SaaS environments. When breaches occur, investigations can commence immediately. By using the leading-edge IR automation that we term “Forensics as Code,” our responders support team to provide swift answers. This approach significantly cuts response times that used to be measured in days and weeks to hours. Understanding the scope and impact of the breach and cybersecurity incident enables businesses to make informed decisions about the significance of an attack and efficiently report to regulatory authorities, thereby assuring compliance and protecting shareholder interests.

LAST UPDATED:

November 7, 2024

Want to learn more about how enterprises can ensure they are prepared to meet the standard? See what questions leaders have been asking us, or dive deep with this webinar.

Don't miss these stories:

Frost & Sullivan’s Latest 2025 Frost Radar: The Need for Runtime Cloud Security in a Cloud-First World

Cloud breaches rose 35% year over year in 2024, and legacy security tools are failing to keep up. The rapid sprawl of multi-cloud and SaaS has shattered the assumptions baked into legacy, on-prem, and endpoint-focused security stacks, which can’t keep pace with today’s dynamic attack surfaces.

The Remote Worker Scam: Understanding the North Korean Insider Threat

Recent investigations have uncovered a sophisticated scheme by North Korean operatives to exploit remote work policies in the U.S. tech industry.

Who Touched My GCP Project? Understanding the Principal Part in Cloud Audit Logs – Part 2

This second part of the blog series continues the path to understanding principals and identities in Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Audit Logs. Part one introduced core concepts around GCP logging, the different identity types, service accounts, authentication methods, and impersonation.

Mitiga Security Advisory: Lack of Forensic Visibility with the Basic License in Google Drive

Mitiga's advisory highlights critical gaps in forensic visibility with Google Drive's Basic license, affecting security and incident investigations. Read on.

Cloud Detection vs Cloud Threat Hunting: Insights for Cyber Leaders

As cyber threats evolve, security teams need to detect and mitigate cloud attacks. Learn why cloud detection and threat hunting are key defense strategies.

Oops, I Leaked It Again — How Mitiga Found PII in Exposed Amazon RDS Snapshots

A recent Mitiga Research Team investigation found the well-regarded Amazon Relational Database Service is leaking PII via exposed RDS Snapshots.