AI Agent Runtime SecurityEvery AI agent acts through your identities.

Mitiga shows you what it did, then stops it before it matters. Built by your team. Bought from a vendor. Connected by an employee.

If it can act in your environment, Mitiga makes its activity visible, attributable, and reversible.

EDR protects the endpoint. Guardrails protect the prompt. Mitiga protects everything else.

What is AI Agent Runtime Security?

AI Agent Runtime Security is runtime detection and response for AI agents. It reconstructs what an agent did through the identities it acts on, across cloud, SaaS, identity, third-party services, and AI, and contains that activity before it reaches the business.

The problemWould you know if one of your AI agents was compromised right now?

Agents take action. They read data, call APIs, change records, and trigger other agents. Every action runs through a credential, like a service account, OAuth grant, API token, workload identity, or delegated session.

They act through your credentials, at machine speed, without a human watching each step. The only signal that something is wrong is behavior. That means what an agent touched, when, on whose authority, and what changed as a result.

25%

of enterprise breaches will trace back to AI agent misuse by 2028.

40%

of CIOs will demand tooling that tracks, oversees, or contains what agents do.

Source: Gartner

Why this matters nowAI agents are the newest privileged users in the enterprise. Your legacy stack was built to watch humans and endpoints.

01Agents take action

Copilot Studio and Agentforce agents, Bedrock and Azure AI Foundry apps, and coding agents on developer laptops now read data, call APIs, change records, and trigger other agents.

02Nobody owns the full picture

Engineering builds some agents, business users stand up others inside Agentforce and Copilot Studio, and employees connect their own. Most security teams cannot say which agents can reach critical data, let alone what those agents did last week.

03The attacker is faster than the review

Mandiant's M-Trends puts the median time from initial access to hand-off between attacker groups at 22 seconds. A compromised agent moves at the same speed, and looks like legitimate automation while it does.

A compromised agent doesn't need to break in, because it already has access. The only signal that something is wrong is behavior.

Standards bodies and platform vendors are starting to respond. NIST's AI Agent Standards Initiative, the mid-2026 MCP authorization model, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, and Google's Agent Identity give agents distinct identities. They make agents attributable. They don't tell you what an agent did with that identity, or whether it should have.

Where agents liveWhich agents are we even
talking about?

Every enterprise now runs three kinds of agents at once, and most security teams can only see one of them.

First-partyHomegrown agents

Your engineers build these on Bedrock, Azure AI Foundry, or a custom stack. Each one inherits whatever role an engineer assigned it and grows past it over time.

Runs on
Bedrock / Foundry

Third-partyVendor agents

These are sanctioned SaaS and platform agents, like Copilot Studio, Agentforce, and vendor-built automations. They connect through an OAuth grant nobody watches after approval.

Runs on
Copilot Studio / Agentforce

ShadowEmployee-connected agents

These include coding agents on developer laptops, personal AI tools connected with a work identity, and MCP servers and skills nobody reviewed.

Runs on
Developer machines

If it can act in your environment on your credentials, Mitiga makes its activity visible, whoever owns it.

Skillgate · free

Skillgate is the free, community-powered scanner for third-party and shadow AI skills, prompts, configs, and repositories, before a skill or MCP server ever runs.

Agent identity to impactThe five questions security leaders ask the morning after an agent misbehaves

Only Mitiga answers all five. Every other tool in the market answers one.

QuestionWho answers it todayThe gap
What agent acted?Inventory and AI-BOM toolsThese tools only see agents they discovered or were wired into. They miss an agent that uses a plain OAuth grant.
On whose authority?Identity providers and agent-identity platformsThey issue the identity. They do not connect it to what happened downstream.
What did it do?Inline guardrails see the prompt and the tool call, and workload sensors see the processNeither sees the cloud event, the SaaS record change, and the identity grant as one story.
How far did it reach?SIEM, if the logs are there and someone writes the queriesAnalysts spend hours to days correlating cloud, SaaS, and identity logs by hand.
What do we do right now?Guardrails block the next prompt, and posture tools open a ticketNobody revokes the token, quarantines the identity, and reverses the change in one motion.

What agent acted?

Who answers it today

Inventory and AI-BOM tools

The gap

These tools only see agents they discovered or were wired into. They miss an agent that uses a plain OAuth grant.

On whose authority?

Who answers it today

Identity providers and agent-identity platforms

The gap

They issue the identity. They do not connect it to what happened downstream.

What did it do?

Who answers it today

Inline guardrails see the prompt and the tool call, and workload sensors see the process

The gap

Neither sees the cloud event, the SaaS record change, and the identity grant as one story.

How far did it reach?

Who answers it today

SIEM, if the logs are there and someone writes the queries

The gap

Analysts spend hours to days correlating cloud, SaaS, and identity logs by hand.

What do we do right now?

Who answers it today

Guardrails block the next prompt, and posture tools open a ticket

The gap

Nobody revokes the token, quarantines the identity, and reverses the change in one motion.

Governance vendors control the agent from the inside. Posture vendors map what it could reach. The SOC still has to reconstruct what the agent did across the modern infrastructure, and stop it. That reconstruction, detection, and response is Mitiga's AI Agent Runtime Security.

Governance vendors control the agent from the inside. Posture vendors map what it could reach. The SOC still has to reconstruct what the agent did across the modern infrastructure, and stop it. That reconstruction, detection, and response is Mitiga's AI Agent Runtime Security.

CoverageFour scenarios Mitiga AI Agent Runtime Security targets

01Third-party agent compromise

A sanctioned vendor agent starts using its access in a way it never has before.

Signals include bulk reads, off-hours activity, and new scopes across two SaaS apps. Mitiga ties the grant, the API calls, the data reached, and the downstream cloud activity into one incident. Then it revokes the grant.

02Homegrown agent overreach

An agent inherits a broad role and starts touching and accessing resources outside its task.

A Bedrock or Foundry agent's behavior drifts from what its role allows. Mitiga shows the gap between the two and flags the drift before it becomes an incident.

03Coding agent and MCP supply chain

A developer installs a skill or MCP server carrying hidden execution or credential exfiltration.

Skillgate catches it for free before the agent acts, without executing code. If it already acted, Mitiga shows what the developer's credentials did next.

04Cascading agent actions

One compromised agent triggers tools, services, and other agents at machine speed.

Mitiga correlates the sequence into one attack story and timeline, and identifies the safest point to contain it and prevent impact.

How Mitiga is differentReconstruct what happened and contain it before business impact.

Mitiga's evidence comes from logs you already have, spans every supported source, and ends in a reversible action

DimensionInline guardrail platformsInline guardrail platformsMitiga's Agentic Substrate
SeesPrompts, tool calls, MCP and A2A trafficWorkload process and network, plus cloud and AI-platform configurationEverything the role did, including prompts, model invocations, MCP and tool calls, identity events, cloud control-plane, and SaaS audit trails, from the platform logs you already have
CoversAgents wired in through an SDK, gateway, or platform integrationAgents on your compute, plus the posture of SaaS-platform agentsAny agent whose actions leave a trace in a supported cloud, SaaS, identity, or AI source
WhenBefore the action (inline)Continuous posture, plus runtime where a sensor is deployedContinuous detection after the action and containment before business impact
LookbackFrom the day it was installedFrom the day it was installedTo the start of log retention, including before any agent control existed
ResponseBlocks or masks the interactionFixes the configuration and raises the alertRevokes the token or session, quarantines the identity, reverses the change, through named integrations
DeployedCode, proxy, or platform connector per agentAgent-based sensor on workloads plus cloud APIAgentless, log- and API-based

Sees

Inline guardrail platforms

Prompts, tool calls, MCP and A2A traffic

Inline guardrail platforms

Workload process and network, plus cloud and AI-platform configuration

Mitiga's Agentic Substrate

Everything the role did, including prompts, model invocations, MCP and tool calls, identity events, cloud control-plane, and SaaS audit trails, from the platform logs you already have

Covers

Inline guardrail platforms

Agents wired in through an SDK, gateway, or platform integration

Inline guardrail platforms

Agents on your compute, plus the posture of SaaS-platform agents

Mitiga's Agentic Substrate

Any agent whose actions leave a trace in a supported cloud, SaaS, identity, or AI source

When

Inline guardrail platforms

Before the action (inline)

Inline guardrail platforms

Continuous posture, plus runtime where a sensor is deployed

Mitiga's Agentic Substrate

Continuous detection after the action and containment before business impact

Lookback

Inline guardrail platforms

From the day it was installed

Inline guardrail platforms

From the day it was installed

Mitiga's Agentic Substrate

To the start of log retention, including before any agent control existed

Response

Inline guardrail platforms

Blocks or masks the interaction

Inline guardrail platforms

Fixes the configuration and raises the alert

Mitiga's Agentic Substrate

Revokes the token or session, quarantines the identity, reverses the change, through named integrations

Deployed

Inline guardrail platforms

Code, proxy, or platform connector per agent

Inline guardrail platforms

Agent-based sensor on workloads plus cloud API

Mitiga's Agentic Substrate

Agentless, log- and API-based

Where Mitiga starts

Both layers matter, but nobody built either one to answer what happened. Astolen agent token, a vendor's OAuth grant, or an agent nobody registered never passes through a gateway nobody wired to it or a sensor nobody deployed.

OutcomesWhat AI Agent Runtime Security on Mitiga delivers

01The whole chain

Helios AIDR ties the prompt, the model invocation, and the MCP call to what changed downstream in cloud, SaaS, and identity.

02One incident across planes

Mitiga correlates cloud, SaaS, identity, and AI activity into a single attack story.

03Retroactive investigation

Because the evidence is the logs you already collect, Mitiga can answer "What did our agents do in the last [N] days?" on day one.

04Reversible containment

Revoke the grant, quarantine the identity, and reverse the change. That's Zero-Impact Breach Prevention, applied to agents.

05Coverage for agents no one registered

A third-party agent connected through an OAuth grant, or a shadow agent using an employee's token, never passes through a gateway or sensor. It still leaves logs, and Mitiga still sees it.

06Build-time coverage without a proxy

Skillgate scans skills, hooks, MCP configurations, and instruction files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md) before an agent acts on them. It's free and requires no code execution.

Why other approaches fall short"Our logs are too late"
asks the wrong question

After the fact, who can tell you what the agent actually did? Whoever wired the gateway can't, because the agent nobody registered never passes through it. The posture scan can't either, because it only maps what an agent could reach.

Mitiga is built for the part they leave uncovered. It shows you what happened and what to do about it right now.

The proofWhat Mitiga surfaces once it's watching your agents

X days

of agent activity reconstructed on day one, from logs you already have.

X min

average time from detection to reversible containment.

XX

supported clouds, SaaS apps, identity providers, and AI platforms.

XX

agent-driven incidents reconstructed to date.

Zero-Impact Breach Prevention. Let them come.

Frequently asked questions

No. Guardrails and inline platforms sit in the prompt or tool-call path and can block an action before it happens, for the agents wired into them. Mitiga sits outside that path. It watches the identity, cloud, SaaS, and AI logs every agent leaves behind, and it can revoke, quarantine, and reverse after the fact. The two are complementary. Most enterprises need both.

Yes, that's where Mitiga is strongest. A third-party agent using a plain OAuth grant, or an employee's personal AI tool connected with a work identity, never passes through a gateway. It still leaves a trace in your cloud, SaaS, and identity logs, and Mitiga still sees it.

Because the evidence is the logs your organization already collects, Mitiga can investigate agent activity from before your team put any agent control in place.

Where Mitiga has visibility into the prompt itself (Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Agentforce, and Copilot logs) it surfaces prompt-level signals from Helios AIDR as one input alongside identity, cloud, and MCP evidence. Where it doesn't have the prompt, Mitiga detects the behavior that results from it.

Mitiga runs continuous runtime detection from the logs and APIs your platforms already produce. Latency depends on the source. Mitiga does not claim inline, before-the-action blocking. That's the job of guardrail platforms, and the two work together.

No. Mitiga is agentless with no SDK, proxy, or code change inside the agent. It works from the logs and APIs your cloud, SaaS, identity, and AI platforms already produce.

Mitiga takes supported, reversible response actions through named integrations. It revokes the token or session, quarantines the identity, and reverses the change where the integration supports it.

Mitiga covers agents whose actions appear in a supported cloud, SaaS, identity, or AI source, not an unqualified "every agent."

Zero-Impact Breach Prevention for AI agentsGive your SOC the one thing it's missing, a record of what your agents did

Every AI agent in your environment acts through an identity you already issued. Mitiga
reconstructs what it did across cloud, SaaS, and identity, and stops it before it becomes
business impact. That's Zero-Impact Breach Prevention, for AI agents.

Let them come.